How Large CT Scans Play Into Brain Tumor Research
By Rob Sutter
For those who may not know a single thing about CT scans, I can give you a general definition. Basically, they are used to detect anything related to brain tumor research along with hemorrhages or bone trauma. As a result, they can be very helpful, though is it possible that these scans can increase the levels of cancer found in people? Considering the results which have been uncovered in the past, it seems like this is becoming the case, which is an unfortunate piece of news.
An article on TVNZ said that, according to recent brain tumor research findings, those who receive CT scans before the age of 20 increase their risk of cancer. This was discovered by a team of researchers within the Melbourne University School of Population and Global Health. The group was headed by Professor John Matthews, who said that these should be limited. Considering the symptoms which are cited by organizations like Voices Against Brain Cancer, I don't think that anyone is going to be confused as to why this is.
In terms of radiation, I can't help but notice that these scans have shifted to some degree. The article went into detail about this, saying that the rates seen in 1985 through 2005 were higher than they are as of this moment. The problem is that this is still a problem amongst those who are younger. In fact, it's been said that younger people who decided to take up these scans - in comparison to those who didn't - would be 24 percent more likely to be diagnosed with cancer.
Let's say that you're looking at a number of young people; for the sake of argument, 10,000 people. If you're focusing on that group on its own, it's possible that 39 cases of cancer can come to the surface, not including CT scans. If such scans seem to be the case, though, I think that you could get, at least, 6 more diagnoses. Anyone can probably make the connection that the bigger such a group is, the more likely it is that cancer rates will increase with it.
Cancer is one of those cases in which it's difficult to cite the source of. However, I think just about anyone can tell you that radiation is the biggest factor and, as such, it's one that you will want to stay away from. This probably goes without saying but these CT scans are definitely proof of it. I don't think that those who understand these scans will go about them so willingly, thus potentially reducing the diagnoses which may be uncovered in the world.
An article on TVNZ said that, according to recent brain tumor research findings, those who receive CT scans before the age of 20 increase their risk of cancer. This was discovered by a team of researchers within the Melbourne University School of Population and Global Health. The group was headed by Professor John Matthews, who said that these should be limited. Considering the symptoms which are cited by organizations like Voices Against Brain Cancer, I don't think that anyone is going to be confused as to why this is.
In terms of radiation, I can't help but notice that these scans have shifted to some degree. The article went into detail about this, saying that the rates seen in 1985 through 2005 were higher than they are as of this moment. The problem is that this is still a problem amongst those who are younger. In fact, it's been said that younger people who decided to take up these scans - in comparison to those who didn't - would be 24 percent more likely to be diagnosed with cancer.
Let's say that you're looking at a number of young people; for the sake of argument, 10,000 people. If you're focusing on that group on its own, it's possible that 39 cases of cancer can come to the surface, not including CT scans. If such scans seem to be the case, though, I think that you could get, at least, 6 more diagnoses. Anyone can probably make the connection that the bigger such a group is, the more likely it is that cancer rates will increase with it.
Cancer is one of those cases in which it's difficult to cite the source of. However, I think just about anyone can tell you that radiation is the biggest factor and, as such, it's one that you will want to stay away from. This probably goes without saying but these CT scans are definitely proof of it. I don't think that those who understand these scans will go about them so willingly, thus potentially reducing the diagnoses which may be uncovered in the world.
About the Author:
Visit Voices Against Brain Cancer if you are searching for more information about brain cancer research.
By Rob Sutter
For those who may not know a single thing about CT scans, I can give you a general definition. Basically, they are used to detect anything related to brain tumor research along with hemorrhages or bone trauma. As a result, they can be very helpful, though is it possible that these scans can increase the levels of cancer found in people? Considering the results which have been uncovered in the past, it seems like this is becoming the case, which is an unfortunate piece of news.
An article on TVNZ said that, according to recent brain tumor research findings, those who receive CT scans before the age of 20 increase their risk of cancer. This was discovered by a team of researchers within the Melbourne University School of Population and Global Health. The group was headed by Professor John Matthews, who said that these should be limited. Considering the symptoms which are cited by organizations like Voices Against Brain Cancer, I don't think that anyone is going to be confused as to why this is.
In terms of radiation, I can't help but notice that these scans have shifted to some degree. The article went into detail about this, saying that the rates seen in 1985 through 2005 were higher than they are as of this moment. The problem is that this is still a problem amongst those who are younger. In fact, it's been said that younger people who decided to take up these scans - in comparison to those who didn't - would be 24 percent more likely to be diagnosed with cancer.
Let's say that you're looking at a number of young people; for the sake of argument, 10,000 people. If you're focusing on that group on its own, it's possible that 39 cases of cancer can come to the surface, not including CT scans. If such scans seem to be the case, though, I think that you could get, at least, 6 more diagnoses. Anyone can probably make the connection that the bigger such a group is, the more likely it is that cancer rates will increase with it.
Cancer is one of those cases in which it's difficult to cite the source of. However, I think just about anyone can tell you that radiation is the biggest factor and, as such, it's one that you will want to stay away from. This probably goes without saying but these CT scans are definitely proof of it. I don't think that those who understand these scans will go about them so willingly, thus potentially reducing the diagnoses which may be uncovered in the world.
An article on TVNZ said that, according to recent brain tumor research findings, those who receive CT scans before the age of 20 increase their risk of cancer. This was discovered by a team of researchers within the Melbourne University School of Population and Global Health. The group was headed by Professor John Matthews, who said that these should be limited. Considering the symptoms which are cited by organizations like Voices Against Brain Cancer, I don't think that anyone is going to be confused as to why this is.
In terms of radiation, I can't help but notice that these scans have shifted to some degree. The article went into detail about this, saying that the rates seen in 1985 through 2005 were higher than they are as of this moment. The problem is that this is still a problem amongst those who are younger. In fact, it's been said that younger people who decided to take up these scans - in comparison to those who didn't - would be 24 percent more likely to be diagnosed with cancer.
Let's say that you're looking at a number of young people; for the sake of argument, 10,000 people. If you're focusing on that group on its own, it's possible that 39 cases of cancer can come to the surface, not including CT scans. If such scans seem to be the case, though, I think that you could get, at least, 6 more diagnoses. Anyone can probably make the connection that the bigger such a group is, the more likely it is that cancer rates will increase with it.
Cancer is one of those cases in which it's difficult to cite the source of. However, I think just about anyone can tell you that radiation is the biggest factor and, as such, it's one that you will want to stay away from. This probably goes without saying but these CT scans are definitely proof of it. I don't think that those who understand these scans will go about them so willingly, thus potentially reducing the diagnoses which may be uncovered in the world.
About the Author:
Visit Voices Against Brain Cancer if you are searching for more information about brain cancer research.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment